Analysis of Steve Jobs leadership

Questions: 1.Demonstrates how a range of leadership theories, approaches and perspectives apply to the leadership style of Steve Jobs? 2.Include an evaluation of Steve Jobs leadership style during his time at Apple in the context of the contemporary leadership? Answers: 1.Comparison between Steve Jobs and Tim Cook It can be said that both of these individuals thatisJobs and Cook had been facing the pressure at work and they have spent lots of years workingtowardsthe perfection and abilityto movethe people out of the business who were not performing well. When Jobswasthe CEO, the clients were in a beneficial positionbecause hehad an ability to get the best out of the employeesand provide with the most excellent quality of goodshowever itwasn't easy to work with Jobs (McInerney, 2017). There have been different leadership traits shown by both the leaders thatareJobs and Cook. These two leaders have been focussing on their own ideologiesfor locationof course, strategies of marketing and client contentment. The different leadership styles have been followed and these have been discussed underneath with comparison among both ofthem innovationof product: there was a strategy of producing "insanely good items "atApple,when Jobs was in the position. He would make best of his efforts tocreate anyitem. In case any worker would be on vacation on leave, he would want him to work overnight to carry out the required transformations (Proctor, Bicknell, 2012). This way he was not considerate about the psychological harm to the workers. Therefore he treated the human resources just as stalls for making great items or services for the customers all over the world. Rather, Tim Cookgives properattention to each and every aspectinthe business. Herealiseswhat the workers want and also focuses on the social responsibility my betterment of the work environment. This change in leadership has led to a high impact on the innovation met thirds of Apple. The leadership of Steve Jobs created rebels however thing who has a gentlestrategy whichmakes the business to be conventional in approach. As for different studies by the professionals of the industry, during the leadership of Cook, Apple had started to update thecurrent lineof course rather than bringing any revolution totablesuch as iPad,iPhoneand iPods. As for the employees of Apple, Steve Jobs had been a CEO off the warfare. He came back to Apple when the business was suffering and so he was extraordinary confident and his aggressive nature brought Apple back to the market. At that point of time digression was appreciated however after gaining the reputation of global leader in communication technology, he was advised that this aggression had to be controlled somehow. However Cook seems to be very come in nature and he is not aggressive therefore the business has taken a gentle turn (Steinwart, Ziegler, 2014). As per book, Steve was focused to words the development of innovative ports in excellent products however he ignored the interest of his workforce and considers them only as ways of fulfilling the goals of the company. However Cook has been focusing on all the aspects of the business. Prior to Cook, there was a complicated financial and operating of situation. Even though Jobs had been providing with an example of visionary leadership by providing with innovative designs, still there was a compromise on the Quality side. There were also issues because of rising costs and bad accessibility of the items. Apple had been a constant player in the market but by Cook taking over the organization, there was a revolution. He turned out to be a change agent for the policies of competitiveness and marketing. He was experienced at IBM where he had gained knowledge of supply change management. Therefore Cook brought in huge amendments in designing, reducing, marketing strategies of Apple. His leadership style is based on the theory that there is simple way out is for every complicated issue. For working towards this theory, he initiated huge marketing campaigns, expense saving strategies and engineering tasks. Even though Cook has shown that he has been talented to Control Apple as a company still there or various things which he lacks, in comparison to Jobs. Jobs had a real charismatic power. His charismatic leadership, brilliance was recognised for his capacity to make the workforce cry. He could get work done from people at any point of time. Cook also has brilliance and can also manage people well. There is one common characteristic of both the leaders which is competitiveness. 2.Analysis of Steve Jobs leadership approch regarding the contemporary leadership Steve Jobs have been a transformational leader because he laid his goals himself and performed extraordinarily to attain those. Steve Jobs had been an exceptional leader and is thought out to be a leading figure in the two industries that is computer industry and entertainment industry. He had made a huge effect on the contemporary community by his involvement, achievements that he got in the industry. He had a tough style of managing. The major challenges which are usually faced by the global leaders have been categorised into six types. Both these leaders anyhow face these challenges consistently. These are: Building managerial efficiency, motivating and inspiring other people, development of staff members, Leading the team, initiating and managing change, dealing with internal stakeholders and business politics. The Contemporary leaders have to lead and motivate a diversify team of individuals, performed across the business boundaries, and hence the affectedness and also focus on the development. Externally also they experience a complicated and globalised situation and therefore they have to deal with the needs of the government for competitors and stakeholders. In this contemporary world, there are various cultures in ward there for the leaders have to be Aware of them, in order to be successful. They have to work beyond the cultural boundaries and also with people who are not like them and differ in terms of getting work completed. The major challenges faced by contemporary leaders have been segregated into six common heads. The leaders face challenge of developing the required capabilities like management of time, privatising, decision making, and strategy making and also matching the pace of the work. These leaders have to motivate other people also so that they are contented with their job roles. In case of Steve Jobs, the implies had been considered as weird tools for carrying out the job however the contemporary leaders need to know the art of motivating people to work in the smarter way. The leaders need to build a team, develop 13 and manage it by instilling of pride in it and supporting it. The leaders also need to aware of the ways of managing a huge team and also about the ways of taking over a fresh team. Change management is also a great issue which has to be handled very carefully by the leaders. There are various employees who resist change and a successful leader is one who can overcome such resi stance and deal with the workers in an efficient manner. The leaders have to deal with the relationship management and image building of the business. Not like Steve Jobs, rather like Tim Cook, the leaders have gained the managerial support and also to get by in from different divisions, teens and people. Since Apple is a huge company therefore the workload is highly challenging and there are many unique innovative and critical projects carried out with handful of resources in the team ("Steve Jobs vs Tim Cook: Who is Better As a CEO of Apple?", 2017). Therefore the leaders have to juggle the priorities at the forefront. The biggest challenge faced by contemporary leaders like Tim Cook is that the global business environment ensures that the businesses will always be facing dramatic changes beyond their control. Conclusion and Recommendations It is very clear that the contemporary leaders face more complications all over the globe. Even though Steve Jobs was not appreciated by many however being a visionary, lots of people also find his leadership style to be attractive. Tim Coke can be termed as an ideal leader for Apple if the contemporary issues and gentler work approaches are to be kept in mind. Steve Jobs was anyhow one of the big giant off the computer business. His leadership style has been compared to many however the new challenge for Tim Cook is to move out of the shadow of Jobs. One more leadership skills of Jobs forced to cough being patient. He did not rush anything and required more time in preparing what he did. He had been totally focused on the products to be provided and to Swiss francs ability end to end. At the foreign Jobs and is tiny thing created a design for the latest Macintosh, in the beginning of 80s, he wanted to create an insanely great product (Hardy, 2017). He was not focused to words maximi sation of profits or trade of among the expenses. He wanted no compromises and wanted to deliver the best product which would bring revolution in the computer industry. Theory of Jobs was to focus on creating great items and does the profits followed on their own. Similarly John Sculley who also managed Apple from 1983 to 1993 had been focused more two words the maximising revenues rather than designs. This theory of Scully led to a gradual decline in the business of Apple. Concluding the same, Jobs had put everything into the business be it his personality, stress, weaknesses and his way of lading. He had been a task oriented leader and was always focused to words his job and business performance, ignoring what public, Staff members all individuals felt about him and his ways of lading. He was an unconventional leader and had a confidence on his own style of managing ("5 Surprising Insights About Steve Jobss Management Style", 2017). He had a belief in whatever he did. His demand of excellence from the workers led to great criticism for him. He had an ability to make people follow him even if they did not want to audit not preferable. He was a great Resource to Apple because of his unconventional mail fleeting. He believed in Duckers theory of old-fashioned way of leadership. He did not take leadership like a rule or responsibility rather he took it as a position or ranking therefore he treated other implies as mere resources for attaining the busines s goals. It is recommended that the new styles are applied and not just the style of Steve is followed, rather a mix of styles of Jobs and Cook is beneficial. References 5 Surprising Insights About Steve Jobss Management Style. (2017). Fast Company. Retrieved 20 April 2017, from https://www.fastcompany.com/3044205/5-surprising-insights-about-steve-jobs-management-style Hardy, E. (2017). With Steve Jobs Passing, Apple Looks to New Leadership. Brighthand.com. Retrieved 20 April 2017, from https://www.brighthand.com/news/with-steve-jobs-passing-apple-looks-to-new-leadership/ McInerney, S. (2017). Steve Jobs: an unconventional leader. Executive Style. Retrieved 20 April 2017, from https://www.executivestyle.com.au/steve-jobs-an-unconventional-leader-1lcmo Poomath, J. (2014). Book Review: Yukari Iwatani Kane, Haunted Empire: Apple after Steve Jobs. Paradigm, 18(2), 239-241. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971890714558711 Proctor, N., Bicknell, T. (2012). Apple After Steve Jobs, Re: Museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 55(4), 479-485. Steinwart, M., Ziegler, J. (2014). Remembering Apple CEO Steve Jobs as a Transformational Leader. Journal Of Leadership Education, 13(2), 52-66. Steve Jobs vs Tim Cook: Who is Better As a CEO of Apple?. (2017). Igeeksblog.com. Retrieved 20 April 2017, from https://www.igeeksblog.com/steve-jobs-vs-tim-cook/